UT academia holds its hands out for welfare and demands that the UTAD give them more money.
What else would you expect from people who teach and promote Marxism?
You have to read some of the comments. Down-right scary.
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
TennesseeTuxedo
|
UT Faculty Has Designs On The $15 Million From The ESPN Contract |
Lead | ||
|
UT Academia Wants That $15 Million From
The New ESPN CONTRACT
UT academia holds its hands out for welfare and demands that the UTAD give them more money. What else would you expect from people who teach and promote Marxism? You have to read some of the comments. Down-right scary.
_____________________
"Bit by bit, year by year, the Big Orange glow has dimmed. Too many key losses in too many big games since '98 have removed Tennessee from the elite list of teams annually considered as national championship contenders. It takes more than one of the biggest stadiums in college football and a nifty fight song to be in the national title hunt every year. Not only does it take great recruiting, but taking the talent and improving it, and neither has happened with the Vols lately. _________________ UT markets Nostalgia/Traditions rather than Wins vs Losses. --AtlantaVol
Last Edited By: TennesseeTuxedo 01/18/09 11:47:33.
Edited 1 time.
|
||||
|
|
||||
associate ad in charge of film |
Yikes. | #1 | ||
|
Gimme gimme gimme. Obviously if the athletic department weren't around the academics would get that $87 mil and have a surplus!
Well, until they saw a surplus and increased their spending to meet it. (yeah, yeah, I know there wouldn't be $87 mil for them, was just commenting on the fiscal nature of people who are given money instead of earning it.)
Lets knock people on their ass & see if they want more of it. -homer
|
||||
|
|
||||
Napervol |
AD should keep all its money, however...there are many wasted opportunities | #2 | ||
|
The facilities of the University basically suck. Dorms to classrooms- sucks. Behind the times, not enough spending and planning has occurred over the last 25
years. For example, the day before class started in 2007, my son had no location for his English class because they did not know where they would have it for
lack of space. He had two of five classes that met in the library. As I walked around campus that summer, it was amazing how the athletic facilities had
advanced, and nothing else looked different since I graduated in '77 other than the new Glocker was going up.
I realize that athletics for all sorts of reasons moved forward- but the real reason was based on the support of individual contributions to the University. I also realize that great athletic facilities makes for better teams which makes for more exposure for the University which makes the University better overall. If the academics want to change something, they should change: 1- the number of students enrolled. Make it a lot harder to get in- drop enrollment by 5% for several years. 2- The lottery. Some of that money should go towards the facilities and faculty. Having students actually making money from the many scholarships is outrageous. Problem is the lack of leadership from Nashville to merry go round since Dr. Boling retired years ago in UT campus leadership. |
||||
|
|
||||
Riversetvol |
Best example of Communism is Title lX................ | #3 | ||
|
from each according to HIS ability
to each according to HER need. If I was in charge I would have 3 sports, football and mens and womens basketball, eliminate all the non-revenue sports and give the extra $30-35 million to Academics. |
||||
|
|
||||
rossvol |
#4 | |||
|
Tux,
In today's vernacular it's called sharing the wealth and being a patriot. Sound familiar? You're right, Frederick Engels would love this debate. |
||||
|
|
||||
LynchburgVol |
ESPN is explicitly giving the money because of athletics....... | #5 | ||
|
How about the next time academics receives a grant for research, then give some of that money to the athletics department?
|
||||
|
|
||||
normbland |
The people of Tennessee have spoken . . . | #6 | ||
|
with their votes and dollars, and they have clearly shown that they value championship athletic teams more than top-shelf education at any level.
Poor choice, IMO, but it's their choice, so give the people what they want. It's their decision, their money, and their future. Viva democracy. |
||||
|
|
||||
Volmeister |
You wouldn't be able to maintain Div 1 status | #7 | ||
|
with just 3 sports. I think we are at or close to the minimium now.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Volmeister |
A couple of years ago, the AD borrowed from the Univ | #8 | ||
|
to pay off Petersons buyout.
|
||||
|
|
||||
VolDave |
UT athletics is our endowment program. | #9 | ||
|
Where Ivy League Schools have Billion dollar endowments that help support their schools, we have sports. While the UTAD should help take up some of the slack
in lean times, the University shouldn't lose sight of the fact that a healthy UTAD is in the best interest of everyone over the long term.
|
||||
|
|
||||
ProfessorVol |
#10 | |||
|
Hey, we don't all espouse Marxism. I agree that our FB program is the bell cow (the main reason I'm still dubious of MH's abilities), but at the
same time, the University has made little academic progress over the years and needs to make sure it's pay scale for faculty is competitive.
all the best,
ProfessorVol |
||||
|
|
||||
VolDave |
How have we done at establishing joint ventures with industry Prof? | #11 | ||
|
I know that FedEx and Harrah's have had huge impacts on the University of Memphis. Are there similar arrangements in Knoxville with local industry?
|
||||
|
|
||||
voluble2 |
The academic side has plenty of money. | #12 | ||
|
They just waste it. If they got rid of all of their grievance studies programs they could use that money to pay for classes that will actually educate someone
instead of indoctrinating them. The more people we produce who think the key to getting ahead is to see who can whine the loudest then the more grifters like
Obama we will have running things. They will elect people like themselves who think they are entitled to everything they want despite never having produced
anything of substance in their entire worthless lives.
I can't see any downside to eliminating urban and gender studies courses. You can throw in sociology and a dozen other fields of study that are dead ends as far as having a career that will contribute anything to society. These "fields of study" are like barnacles on the bottom of the boat. They slow us down and make it hard to compete with other countries who aren't so self-possessed. They could also dismiss most of the economics professors and subsitute a work study course at McDonalds for a semester and our graduates would be more economically literate than what we turn out now. Most of what they are taught is bullshit. The only Marxist I have ever met was teaching economics at UT. That was about as productive as having a numerologist teaching calculus or an astrologer teaching astronomy. One has nothing to do with the other. On the other hand you can't really complain about money being divided for political reasons when the athletic programs are part of government institutions. It is not consistent. Athletics and academia have no business being linked in the fashion they are. |
||||
|
|
||||
associate ad in charge of film |
Btw, what the hell are they building on the corner of The Hill? | #13 | ||
|
One the corner where 11th runs into Cumberland they're building something else. Hopefully it's more class rooms.
Lets knock people on their ass & see if they want more of it. -homer
|
||||
|
|
||||
associate ad in charge of film |
Really? I thought there was a big difference today | #14 | ||
Napervol wrote:than when I graduated in '96. New/expanded buildings over by the law school and Jesse Harris, they've done work to Claxton, they put up that monster engineering building when I was there.
Lets knock people on their ass & see if they want more of it. -homer
|
||||
|
|
||||
Napervol |
yep, things have been done | #15 | ||
|
and they put air conditioning in "the zoo", but I am not aware of any new dorms. Presidential was fairly new when I got there in 1973, what dorm has
been added since that one in the late sixties?
I should have said little has changed with the facilities compared to massive changes to athletic facilities (which is good). The new Glocker or whatever they call it is amazingly good- but it knocked out massive numbers of classroom space for two years with little or ineffective planning to handle that situation. My point should have been- it would be nice if the facilities of the school would keep up with athletics- and I blame that on the leadership, not the AD. A better job of facilities would help upgrade the student base and the overall perception of the University. As we looked at schools all across the country, most had newer nicer cleaner campuses- even the ones that were old schools. The local beauty of Knoxville could be enhanced with a longer term fix for the campus. They need to "downtown Chattanooga" the entire area around and including the campus. Once again, the AD should keep all its money. Fans pay for it for that purpose. |
||||
|
|
||||
54321givehim6 |
#16 | |||
|
"They just waste it. If they got rid of all of their grievance studies programs they could use that money to pay for classes that will actually educate
someone instead of indoctrinating them. The more people we produce who think the key to getting ahead is to see who can whine the loudest then the more
grifters like Obama we will have running things. They will elect people like themselves who think they are entitled to everything they want despite never
having produced anything of substance in their entire worthless lives."
Hammer, meet nail! Excellent post! |
||||
|
|
||||
real turf fan |
There is an unfortunate academic precedent | #17 | ||
|
Every academic grant gets hit with overhead charges that eat up over 40% of the grant money That's to pay for administration, the room it takes, the
whatevers.
Solution: Make a list of every person on salary who hasn't taught a class in a year. Take that list and terminate every one with an even number as their last social security number. Lots of savings. Would anyone taking classes notice the attrition? Next year do the same thing (with a different number on the ss#). In the mean time, go after the lottery money. Heck of a lot of it goes to administration of the lottery. Forget Bredesen's pre-kindergarden. Theme: cut out the people who just handle: numbers, reports, for whom there's no end product. |
||||
|
|
||||
homervol |
If we win a couple of SECCs in | #18 | ||
|
the next 5 years.We will be able to contribute to the academic side.Nothing wrong with that.Cost of doing business...............homer
|
||||
|
|
||||
PolemicVol |
I don't support the "University of Football".... | #19 | ||
|
Anymore than I supported the "University of Fulmer".
It's the University of Tennessee I support, of which the athletic department is a component. Seems to me that many of you guys want the tail to wag the dog. If Bushonomics hadn't been so disasterious, then these budget cuts might not have happened. I have a hard time believing the solution is more Rushonomics/Bushonomics. Perhaps an era of focusing upon the commonwealth of the entire nation might be appropriate now. Sharing isn't a bad thing. |
||||
|
|
||||
MrTennessee |
If the admin of the school is like our government | #20 | ||
|
then there is quite a bit of bloat at the top. Cut back on the bloat and you can do fine. This also needs to be done at the governmental level. I'd love to
see what the budget would be if they didn't have all these departments of such and such.
Welcome to Knoxville, Kiffin. May you you have great success here and build a dynasty!
|
||||
|
|
||||